Flight 111 prompts insulation
ban FAA's mylar order to affect 1,230
planes
By Stephen Thorne / The Canadian Press
Ottawa - Insulation used inside the bulkheads of aircraft to keep
heat in and noise out spread the fire that brought down Swissair
Flight 111, prompting regulators to ban the material in commercial
aircraft Wednesday.
Based partly on the recommendations of Canadian investigators,
aviation's top regulator is ordering the metalized mylar insulation
blankets replaced on 699 U.S.-registered airliners within four
years.
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, whose standards are
followed internationally, said the material fails a proposed new
flame-retardency guidelines.
A total of 1,230 aircraft will be affected worldwide. No
Canadian-registered aircraft left the factory fitted with the
insulation.
"Tests show that metalized mylar falls far below the new test
standard," said an FAA statement. "It ignites much more easily than
other materials and can spread fire because its properties are much
different."
The action comes on the heels of an urgent advisory from the
Transportation Safety Board of Canada recommending use of metalized
mylar blankets be reduced or eliminated based on wreckage from
Swissair Flight 111, which crashed into the ocean off Nova Scotia
last September, killing all 229 people on board.
"There are clear indications that a significant source of the
combustible materials that sustained the fire was thermal acoustical
insulation blanket material," the safety board said in a letter to
the FAA written Friday.
"Burnt remnants of this material, quenched by sea water, were
found in the wreckage."
Shortcomings in the material's fire resistance and in the FAA
testing standards were cited by Swissair crash investigators and
others some time ago.
Authorities from the FAA stepped up efforts to develop new
testing standards for insulation blankets, and several companies,
including at least one in Canada, have been working on replacements.
"Certainly Swissair and the involvement of metalized mylar in
that accident has called (its use) into question," Beth Erickson,
director of the FAA aircraft certification service, told a
teleconference.
"I believe that after the Swissair accident we pushed it up in
priority."
The blankets have been identified as a major factor in at least
five other aircraft fires. McDonnell Douglas, Boeing-owned makers of
the MD-11, told operators they should stop using metalized mylar in
1997.
Airlines apparently initiated a limited response, primarily
because of the cost - estimated at between $380,000 US and $880,000
US per aircraft.
"It is the board's view that the operation of aircraft outfitted
with thermal acoustical insulation blankets incorporating metalized
PET cover material constitutes an unnecessary risk," the safety
board said.
The airworthiness directive, when actually enacted after a 45-day
response period, will not require the sweeping insulation
replacement the FAA had discussed in October.
FAA officials said Wednesday the agency backed off the earlier
plan, under which it would have ordered insulation replacements in
nearly every U.S. commercial airplane, because recent research
showed most existing insulation passes or only narrowly fails the
new flame test.
Instead, the more limited order will apply to 699 McDonnell
Douglas planes. They include the MD-80, MD-88, MD-90, DC-10 and the
MD-11, the type of plane that crashed off Nova Scotia.
There are no MD aircraft flown in Canada. Canadian-operated
DC-10s were built before metalized mylar came into use between 1987
and 1994, but some may have been retrofitted with the material, said
board spokesman Jim Harris.
Affected airlines include American, Delta, Continental, Trans
World, Alaska, Federal Express, Reno Air, Aeromexico and US Airways.
Swissair will be subject to a similar order expected from its own
authority.
"The work must be accomplished at the earliest maintenance check
but no later than four years," said the FAA, noting a "safe and
deliberative process" will help prevent wiring damage - always a
risk in such retrofits.
The Swiss pilots of the New York-Geneva flight reported smoke in
the cockpit and were minutes from Halifax airport when they turned
away to dump fuel. They crashed into the Atlantic Ocean near Peggys
Cove.
Investigators found evidence of fire just fore and aft of the
wall between the cockpit and forward galley. Faulty electrical
wiring is believed to have started the fire, though authorities have
not confirmed that.
American Miles Gerety, whose 56-year-old brother, Pierce, died on
Flight 111, was buoyed by the news out of Ottawa.
He said it should help make future air travel safer.
"That's a huge development," Gerety said. "It means that every
airline that's got a plane that's got metalized mylar is going to
worry about it."
Gerety said it's a piece of the Swissair-disaster puzzle, but
stressed many questions remain unanswered.
"In figuring out what caused the crash they may find many things,
like the danger of metalized mylar, that may be capable of downing
an airplane but may not . . . have been the cause of this particular
crash," he said.
Gerety, a lawyer in Bridgeport, Conn., said "the central question
with this crash is why the fire was conveyed forward."
He said the victims' families appreciate the effort of Canadian
air-crash experts and realize it could take years before they learn
what caused the accident.
"I'm convinced in my heart of hearts that they're going to find
(the answer). What is important here is that they get it right. All
of the families know it will take a long, long time."
With Micheal Lightstone |